This site emphasizes scientific accuracy, transparent reasoning, and the limits of forensic toxicology interpretation. The following standards guide its educational content.
Scientific claims should be supported by identifiable sources. Preference is given to original research, validated analytical methods, and authoritative technical guidance. Preliminary findings, case reports, and expert interpretations should be identified as such. A citation should support the specific claim made, with the study population, specimen, method, and limitations considered.
Articles should distinguish laboratory observations from interpretations and conclusions. Numerical results should include units and relevant specimen information. Assumptions, uncertainty, alternative explanations, and gaps in the available evidence should be stated rather than hidden.
The site is developed under the professional direction of Okorie Okorocha, JD, MS, MS, and the Forensic Toxicology Working Group Members.
Working-group attribution does not mean that every member reviewed each article or agrees with every interpretation. Individual contributions and article-specific review should be identified when applicable.
AI tools may assist with drafting, organization, and formatting. Their output is not itself scientific evidence. References, quotations, calculations, and substantive claims require verification against the underlying sources. Use of an AI tool should not be represented as independent expert review.
Readers may report a possible error or missing source to OO@OOESQ.COM. Please identify the article, the disputed passage, and supporting documentation. Substantive corrections should explain what changed; an updated date alone should not imply a complete new review.
Website articles provide general educational information. A case-specific opinion requires review of the relevant records, methods, assumptions, and facts. Reading an article does not establish an attorney-client or expert-consulting relationship.