FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY

Measuring total midazolam and measuring the amount unbound to plasma proteins present different analytical challenges. In a crossover study of nine healthy volunteers, Lammers and colleagues measured both after an overnight fast and after a 36-hour fast.

Which samples could inform the free fraction?

For midazolam, only the samples taken at the observed time of maximum concentration were included in the free-fraction analysis. Other unbound readings fell below the lower limit of quantification. Even at the peak sampling time, 55.6% of unbound midazolam readings were below that limit, while all total concentrations at that time could be quantified. The researchers assigned half the quantification limit to the below-limit values when calculating the free fraction.

Why the finding remained uncertain

The study reported no statistically significant difference in midazolam’s free fraction between fasting conditions. Its post hoc calculation estimated only 7% power to detect a 15% difference in mean free fraction with nine participants. The total concentrations and the assigned values therefore cannot resolve whether a change in protein binding occurred. In a laboratory review, distinguish measured concentrations from values substituted for calculation.

Source

Lammers et al., European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics (2018), full text · DOI